« Sun Patent Team Demanded $36 Million From NetApp | Main | Why Run VMware Over NAS? »

September 13, 2007

Comments

Hey Dave. This is very interesting and a wonderful tribute to the great
minds of file systems. I enjoyed skimming through links you provided and
enjoyed the LFS one the most. I noticed, like WAFL, it discussed
consistency points/checkpoints for storing consecutive file systems and
their metadata on disk and was wondering if this was new to WAFL or if
it was WAFL's write allocation techniques which really set it apart in
the market. Thanks

-- Anonymous

--------------------------------------------------------------
WAFL shares some ideas in common with each of these other file systems, but the implementation is different in many ways.

–Dave Hitz

great WAFL "prior work" references, thanks for the history. btw, same references are mentionned by ZFS founders

Dave,
I have been following your blog for a while now; I find it very interesting.

A while ago I tried to add b-trees to WAFL and to improve its snapshot capabilities. The result was presented at the February 2007 Linux file-system workshop, see this link: http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~ohadrode/papers/LinuxFS_Workshop.pdf

A journal paper is also due to appear. I am interested in your thoughts on the matter. Do these techniques solve a real problem?

Ohad.

Dave ,
Inspiring stuff on FS.Realy inspires new FS to build.

maybe he should sue you or netapp for using his inspiriation as the basis for your filesystem

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to This Blog




© NetApp, Inc.  |  "Safe Harbor" Statement  |  Privacy Policy