« Part III: Since NFSv4 is Stateful It Must Be Less Robust, Right? | Main | NFSv4.1 Specification Reviewed by Area Advisor »

August 14, 2008

Blog Post Series: Since NFSv4 is Stateful It Must Be Less Robust, Right?

This post will serve as the list of pointers to my series on NFSv4 state and robustness:

Part I compares NFSv3 and NFSv4 state recovery and explains why NFSv4 state recovery is superior.

Part II examines the fallacy of linking state with non-robustness in the context of CIFS (which has state and has no recovery) and NFSv4 (which also has state and has recovery).

Part III compares the application experience between NFSv3 and NFSv4 when the server restarts.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ca27e53ef00e554009e9b8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blog Post Series: Since NFSv4 is Stateful It Must Be Less Robust, Right?:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

© NetApp, Inc.  |  "Safe Harbor" Statement