« Part III: Since NFSv4 is Stateful It Must Be Less Robust, Right? | Main | NFSv4.1 Specification Reviewed by Area Advisor »

August 14, 2008

Blog Post Series: Since NFSv4 is Stateful It Must Be Less Robust, Right?

This post will serve as the list of pointers to my series on NFSv4 state and robustness:

Part I compares NFSv3 and NFSv4 state recovery and explains why NFSv4 state recovery is superior.

Part II examines the fallacy of linking state with non-robustness in the context of CIFS (which has state and has no recovery) and NFSv4 (which also has state and has recovery).

Part III compares the application experience between NFSv3 and NFSv4 when the server restarts.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2345678/32358352

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blog Post Series: Since NFSv4 is Stateful It Must Be Less Robust, Right?:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

© NetApp, Inc.  |  "Safe Harbor" Statement