« Flash in the Pan^H^H^H Cloud | Main | The future of Cloud Storage – See it (and me!) at SNW USA »

September 29, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ca27e53ef0120a5fe620b970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Put your zero-sum away:

Comments

Exabyte scale customers?

You really have customers that are pushing 1024 Petabytes on a FAS system?

Which one? Cause I can't get more than a couple hundred Terabytes on mine.

Hi Bob,

Welcome to Exposed! And thanks for taking the bait :)

There are two key concepts in play here:

1) I did note above "near ExaByte" capacity, instead of a full ExaByte. The reality is our largest customers are already well into triple-digit PetaBytes of aggregate raw capacity, with ExaBytes on the horizon during our planning discussions. However due to our market-leading storage efficiency technologies such as thin provisioning, thin cloning and of course dedupe, these same customers are already managing over an ExaByte each of (virtual) aggregate data on their collective NetApp storage systems, respectively.

2) As you note yourself, our individual systems often store a significant fraction of a PetaByte at customer sites. Although capacity-oriented systems often approach a PB of storage at these customer sites, the strategy to scale is federation of storage and storage management. NetApp Operations Manager, Provisioning Manager & Protection Manager are the key tools used by our largest customers to increase the productivity of their storage admins per managed TB. Consistency groups across federated NetApp volumes and/or entire FAS systems help address the performance and capacity requirements of even the most demanding (open systems) applications.

I hope this helps clarify my claim above.

-Val.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

© NetApp, Inc.  |  "Safe Harbor" Statement  |  Privacy Policy